Today is Tuesday October 17th 2006 and I'd like to take the opportunity to share a part of my day with you, to give you a little insight into what life is like in the UK today and to share my thoughts on it.
I returned home from work, prepared dinner in the kitchen, left it to bake/steam and then took a mug of coffee with me to the PC. I checked my emails and then I looked at the news on the BBC's website. Two news articles drew my attention, crime and justice related, and I didn't know whether to rant or cry.
Firstly, in the "Other Top Stories" section, this caught my eye: "Internet user admits 'web-rage'". We are told that "an internet user has been found guilty of what police said was Britain's first 'web-rage' attack". After two men had traded insults in an internet chat room, one managed to trace the other using details obtained online. In December 2005, the convicted travelled 70 miles and beat up his victim with a pickaxe handle.
The article notes that a Detective Constable of the Metropolitan Police said: "This is the first instance of a web-rage attack.'"
How I wish we'd stop using these newly created labels such as web-rage and road-rage and trolley-rage which somehow detract from the reality. This was assault.
Secondly, I saw this little gem and immediately felt sorry for the guilty party: "Fine for letter in recycling bag". Here we are told that "Magistrates have fined a man £200 after finding him guilty of putting paper in a recycling sack for bottles and cans only - breaking council rules." How dare he? How dare anyone? Councils, to whom we pay loads of tax are there to provide and facilitate public services, the collection of refuse being one of many. This has improved through the introduction of recycling and is thus more environmentally friendly, albeit the service itself is generally reduced (through a hidden or less hidden reduction in the frequency of collections). But now we see the draconian application of the ever burgeoning quagmire of attendant rules and regulations being taken all the way to court!
A fine of £200 for one misplaced letter?
This is also a time in which it was recently discovered - horror of horrors - that some councils had silently and stealthily introduced hidden microchips to the "wheelie bins" used for refuse collection, with more councils set to follow the trend. Non-recycled refuse is to be monitored by weight by home - so the councils can fine you for chucking out too much that heads for land fill...
I think that tonight I will be dreaming of the various ways of how to secure wheelie bins, recycling boxes and their storage areas. Your refuse is now a major risk area that needs to be secured. If the council don't get you, a selfish neighbour, a passing yob, or a disgruntled colleague may set you up for a fall. If I come up with something by the morning, I think I may even apply to the BBC's programme Dragons' Den for some investment funding for this business. Refuse is valuable, refuse is BIG business...
For some light relief, I took two phone calls from friends, one of whom is a keen Amazon watcher. That's this Amazon and not the rainforest. He watches the prices keenly. He informed me that the price had come down today on Ian Rankin's latest, so I ordered it, along with Andrew Taylor's latest, and while we were talking. This is also the era of multi-tasking.
Never a day goes by without a little crime fiction...
Recent Comments