I have to say that I don't watch much TV these days; it doesn't excite me like it used to, some years ago. Dalziel and Pascoe is still pretty good though. The latest outing had a local family death intrigue scenario; a "normal" nasty take on football club shenanigans, (for the less normal and more sensational see "Footballers' Wives", if you dare); a bigger production budget conference trip to Amsterdam where Dalziel found himself a murder suspect and not amongst friends; a venture into the world of a death-causing poison, a not so holistic spa and Pascoe's daughter's visit avec, shock, horror, shoplifting and the ensuing personal problems which underly that; and finally, the last in the series, another local story, "A Death in the Family", about a bank robbery, murder and a possibly over closely-knit group of friends.
The first episode was not overly exciting and the second episode came across as a "specialist interest" - footie fans may like it. The fourth, based at the "spa" was notable for Stephen Tompkinson's accomplished portrayal of... No spoilers here, if I can help it. You have to watch! The man did good, though. A must see!
Whilst the Amsterdam episode was reasonably good, this short series finally came into its own in the last episode. The suspense was good; the red herring trails did not lead to Sainsbury's fish counter; and the resolution did keep me guessing. There were some great scenes in this episode, too: Pascoe hitting the library for some psychological insight; Pascoe telling Dalziel, with great authority, about the nature of certain types of human relationships.
It is sometimes the small stuff, the close and claustrophobic world that creates the best suspense. As far as I'm concerned this series closed on a fizz, bang! Great acting, great plot and really good suspense!
One last thing though, please ditch the three quarter length navy outdoor jacket on Pascoe. When he wears it, he looks like he's worming his way into Dalziel's physique, possibly with some additional prosthetic stuffing.
Another thing I've been watching and I'd have to admit, I'm hooked on, is "The Apprentice" on BBC2. This is the programme where Sir Alan Sugar (SAS) is looking for an "apprentice" for his Amstrad empire, along the lines of a "twelve week interview". You can apply online at the BBC, should you feel so inspired, and yes, there will be another series and another vacancy...
Sharon was fired last night. We have to remember that what we on screen is 24 - 48 hrs plus of activity on a task condensed into an episode of 1 hour. As such, for entertainment purposes, the boring bits are edited out, (yes thanks), and the rest is targeted... The best and most sensational bits are kept in; perhaps with an agenda? Whatever. Sharon was not at home here. Never was and never would be. But good on her for the smile on her face when she was fired and when she appeared on "The Apprentice - You're Fired" programme on BBC3. The "whinger" can smile - that's good. I've always been suspicious of editing, even before this programme. "Top Shop" commended Sharon's selling skills according to the programme, but what did we see of that? Nothing. We did see Syed having a ball in the changing rooms with a female customer who needed help with a corset type top and where he clearly "couldn't believe his luck". Macho, alpha male editing? I think so.
Back to the basics. Of those in the hot seat for firing this week, Syed was let off because he managed to sell to the traders. Tuan remains an unknown entity to SAS, but he's a good support within his team, albeit perhaps hiding for now, as might be his strategy. And on to next week, what will come of it?
I ask you this - would you do business with someone who is so apparently keen on "spinning one"/exaggerating (unconvincingly, at that, and there's a recorded history with the BBC, should you so wish) to get a deal? Does SAS want this within his business? I think not. He may like sales, but it was said tonight, he had a choice between a "planner", a "lier" and a "whinger". The "whinger" went. What would you choose over a "lier" and a "planner" while still hoping to retain your business integrity?
Who gets fired next week is up to which team wins. Syed may continue his lucky team streak. But last night SAS's comments indicated that he's seen the true wattage of Syed and what's behind it. With Tuan, the connection to electricity is uncertain, but, behind the scenes, he pulls the stops necessary.
Can Tuan rise to the real issue of being at the forefront of all activity and finally take the lead? Can Syed lose his arrogance to obviously learn from a very successful businessman? Can Ruth still cut the mustard and lose that defiant facial expression? Can Michelle prove herself before the end of the series? Can Paul do the biz and make us love him? Can Ansell finally pull out all the stops and achieve the best results?
I am finding this series compelling viewing. An attraction to working for Amstrad? Not likely. SAS's demands are sometimes understandable and sometimes not, to me.
For next week, if Syed is on the losing team, I reckon he'll get the boot. Results, yes. But the price of that, no. And I reckon that Tuan is playing a decent, silent, strategic game. My "Monopoly" money's on him for the final round, along with Ruth. But then, I could, of course, be wrong. And I'm quaking in my boots, I am...
Good series. Love it. It almost makes up for the lack of enough decent crime drama on the BBC...
Recent Comments